Instant TEA
Back to Home

Assemblage-AI Contributor Credit Policy

Version 1.0 • Effective: Upon publication

1. Purpose

This policy defines how users may earn usage credits through substantive contributions to the critical, interpretive, and technical development of Assemblage-AI. The policy exists to:

  • Recognize intellectual and critical labor as infrastructural work
  • Support reflexive governance of the system
  • Reduce economic barriers to participation
  • Maintain the sustainability of the hosted platform

Credits issued under this policy offset computational costs; they do not represent wages, ownership, or employment.

2. Principle of Alignment

Assemblage-AI treats critique as a constitutive component of the system rather than external feedback. Accordingly:

Valued for theoretical & methodological substance

Quality over quantity

Disagreement is valued, not penalized

3. Eligible Contribution Categories

3.1 Interpretive Critique

Substantive challenges to system outputs, identifying missing actors or alternative theoretical readings.

Function:Surfacing absences and destabilizing premature closure.
3.2 Bias, Ethics, and Governance Review

Identifying epistemic narrowing, colonial assumptions, or hidden governance effects.

Function:Preventing black-boxing and reinforcing reflexive accountability.
3.3 Methodological Evaluation

Assessment of how lenses are operationalized, scoring rubrics, and prompt structures.

Function:Improving research validity and interpretive rigor.
3.4 Documentation & Translation

Improving clarity for non-technical audiences, translation, and educational materials.

Function:Expanding situated participation and interpretive reach.
3.5 Technical & Design Contributions

Code contributions (PRs), performance fixes, and transparency-enhancing design.

Function:Stabilizing the technical substrate without centralizing control.

4. Credit Award Guidelines

Credits are awarded based on substance and impact, not effort claimed.

LevelTypical CharacteristicsRange
MinorClarifications, small corrections, targeted suggestions5–10
ModerateWell-argued critique, documented bias, useful review10–20
SubstantialDeep theoretical intervention, major fix, validated redesign20+

Final credit determination is made by the Assemblage-AI governance team.

5. Review Process

  1. Submit via designated channels (GitHub/Forms).
  2. Reviewed for relevance, specificity, and good faith.
  3. Accepted contributions logged and credits issued.

6. Integrity Safeguards

  • Repetitive or bad-faith submissions rejected.
  • Credits may be capped per period.
  • Disagreement is welcome; manipulation is not.

7. Open Source

This policy applies only to the hosted platform. Forking and self-hosting do not require credits and are not governed by this policy.

8. Usage & Scope

Credits are non-transferable, have no cash value, and apply only to hosted usage. Policy is subject to revision based on community feedback.

"Critical thought is infrastructure."

This policy formalizes a commitment to reward those who help the system see its blind spots, question its assumptions, and remain open to revision.